Task #1533
closed
Task #1503: Testing of the product (9.4.0)
UIX: Extended pwd policy partly redundant?
100%
Description
SETTINGS > Pwd policy
On the basic agenda, I can set a very strict policy.
Then, on the extended agenda, I can make this policy less strict. What's the whole point of this? After all, I could simply set a less strict policy on the basic agenda in the first place.
Let's say I do want to keep all of my policies set on the basic agenda,
AND I want to make sure that all five are, in fact, the minimum number required - I get quite a lovely message :-).
Is this agenda meant to relax the policy between different systems with different pwd policies, is this the main purpose? If that's the case, then it should be made more explicit to help users understand the actual benefit of this agenda.
Files
Updated by Vít Švanda almost 6 years ago
- Assignee changed from Vít Švanda to Ondřej Kopr
Updated by Ondřej Kopr almost 6 years ago
- File policy02.png policy02.png added
- File policy01.png policy01.png added
- Status changed from New to Needs feedback
- Assignee changed from Ondřej Kopr to milus kotisova
- Target version set to Quartz (9.6.0)
- % Done changed from 0 to 90
The message in localization was updated.
Commit: https://github.com/bcvsolutions/CzechIdMng/commit/e55e419f0308325e9af4b38beb6bc377dcc3f7f5 (branch develop)
Result:
Please could you make a review? Thank you.
Updated by Radek Tomiška over 5 years ago
- Assignee changed from milus kotisova to Radek Tomiška
Updated by Radek Tomiška over 5 years ago
- Status changed from Needs feedback to Resolved
- Assignee changed from Radek Tomiška to Ondřej Kopr
- % Done changed from 90 to 100
I did review, it's nice.
Note: we removed the second sentence after consultations => 'Minimum number of additional rules for policy must be same or lower than count of required rules.'
Note: Could be implemented as FE validation in future (field with validation message).