Project

General

Profile

Actions
Copy link

Defect #2527

closed

Sorting by Description fails with multiple scheduled tasks of the same type and empty description

Added by Alena Peterová about 4 years ago. Updated about 4 years ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
Low
Assignee:
Radek Tomiška
Category:
Scheduler
Target version:
10.6.0
Start date:
10/20/2020
Due date:
% Done:

100%

Estimated time:
Affected versions:
10.2.0, 10.3.0, 10.3.1, 10.3.2, 10.3.3, 10.4.0, 10.4.1, 10.4.2, 10.4.3, 10.4.4, 10.5.0, 10.5.1, 10.4.5, 10.4.6, 10.4.7, 10.5.2, 10.5.3, 10.4.8
Owner:

Description

Steps to reproduce:
  • Scheduled tasks -> add another HrEnableContractProcess and don't fill in the description
  • Sort the tasks by "Description"

The same can happen e.g. for multiple scheduled synchronization (SynchronizationSchedulableTaskExecutor).
To get rid of the error, you have to click Ctrl+F5 => cancel sorting.

Low priority, because we usually fill in the description of the scheduled tasks (and use numbers to see their order, that's why we sorted by it :-) )

Files

Download all files
scheduled_tasks_multiple_sort.png (22.9 KB) scheduled_tasks_multiple_sort.png Alena Peterová, 10/20/2020 01:50 PM
scheduled_tasks_multiple.png (34.2 KB) scheduled_tasks_multiple.png Alena Peterová, 10/20/2020 01:50 PM
Actions
Copy link
 #1

Updated by Alena Peterová about 4 years ago 

2020-10-20 15:54:39.390 ERROR 824717 --- [http-nio-8080-exec-6] e.b.i.c.e.ExceptionControllerAdvice.handle : [074221e1-a494-468c-9546-e9d96ac27080] 
java.lang.NullPointerException: null
    at java.lang.String.compareTo(String.java:1155)
    at eu.bcvsolutions.idm.core.scheduler.service.impl.DefaultSchedulerManager.lambda$find$2(DefaultSchedulerManager.java:165)
    at java.util.TimSort.countRunAndMakeAscending(TimSort.java:355)
    at java.util.TimSort.sort(TimSort.java:220)
    at java.util.Arrays.sort(Arrays.java:1512)
    at java.util.stream.SortedOps$SizedRefSortingSink.end(SortedOps.java:348)
    at java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.copyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:482)
    at java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.wrapAndCopyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:471)
    at java.util.stream.ReduceOps$ReduceOp.evaluateSequential(ReduceOps.java:708)
    at java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.evaluate(AbstractPipeline.java:234)
    at java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline.collect(ReferencePipeline.java:499)
    at eu.bcvsolutions.idm.core.scheduler.service.impl.DefaultSchedulerManager.find(DefaultSchedulerManager.java:175)

or when using -Djava.util.Arrays.useLegacyMergeSort=true (#1013)
2020-10-20 15:39:36.925 ERROR 3906163 --- [http-nio-8080-exec-6] e.b.i.c.e.ExceptionControllerAdvice.handle : [c0e91eb4-92aa-42b8-b972-44cfb91dd0ee] 
java.lang.NullPointerException: null
        at eu.bcvsolutions.idm.core.scheduler.service.impl.DefaultSchedulerManager.lambda$find$2(DefaultSchedulerManager.java:165)
        at java.util.Arrays.mergeSort(Arrays.java:1544)
        at java.util.Arrays.legacyMergeSort(Arrays.java:1523)
        at java.util.Arrays.sort(Arrays.java:1510)
        at java.util.stream.SortedOps$SizedRefSortingSink.end(SortedOps.java:348)
        at java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.copyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:482)
        at java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.wrapAndCopyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:471)
        at java.util.stream.ReduceOps$ReduceOp.evaluateSequential(ReduceOps.java:708)
        at java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.evaluate(AbstractPipeline.java:234)
        at java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline.collect(ReferencePipeline.java:499)
        at eu.bcvsolutions.idm.core.scheduler.service.impl.DefaultSchedulerManager.find(DefaultSchedulerManager.java:175)
Actions
Copy link
 #2

Updated by Radek Tomiška about 4 years ago

  • Status changed from New to Needs feedback
  • Assignee changed from Radek Tomiška to Vít Švanda
  • Target version set to 10.6.0
  • % Done changed from 0 to 90
  • Affected versions 10.2.0, 10.3.0, 10.3.1, 10.3.2, 10.3.3, 10.4.0, 10.4.1, 10.4.2, 10.4.3, 10.4.4, 10.5.0, 10.5.1, 10.4.5, 10.4.6, 10.5.2, 10.5.3, 10.4.8 added
Actions
Copy link
 #3

Updated by Vít Švanda about 4 years ago

  • Status changed from Needs feedback to Resolved
  • Assignee changed from Vít Švanda to Radek Tomiška
  • % Done changed from 90 to 100

I did reivew and tested it. Work nice now. LGTM

Actions
Copy link
 #4

Updated by Radek Tomiška about 4 years ago

  • Status changed from Resolved to Closed
Actions
Copy link

Also available in: Atom PDF